Legal Opinion

The Fred E. Sander

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 6, 1914No. 2540PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Admiralty. Libel by James A. Thompson against the sailing schooner Fred E. Sander, her engines, etc. On exceptions to amended libel.

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

The exceptions to the libel were overruled, 208 Fed. 724. An answer was then filed by claimant, the fourth affirmative defense of which set forth the passage of the Workmen’s Compensation Act by the Legislature of the state of Washington, which took effect between employer and employé on the 1st day of October, 1911; that libelant was injured while in the performance of his duty as a “worlcmán” engaged in an “extrahazardous employment” on the premises of his employer, within the state of Washington, on the 18th day of November, 1912, within the meaning of said act, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Straus v. FoxworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Meese v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
  3. Jackson v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
  4. In re SanderDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shaughnessy v. Northland Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Suspine v. Compania Transatlantica Centroamericana, S. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  3. Lindstrom v. Mutual Steamship Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Garrisey v. Westshore Marina AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. The AugustineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API