Legal Opinion

Sekuterski v. Village of Lancaster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1993No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The court erred in directing respondent Village of Lancaster Zoning Board of Appeals to issue petitioners a variance with respect to their garage. The fact that petitioners built the garage based on an erroneously issued building permit does not estop respondents from enforcing the applicable zoning laws (see, Matter of Parkview Assocs. v City of New York, 71 NY2d 274, 282, rearg denied 71 NY2d 995, cert denied 488 US 801). The “rare exception” to the unavailability of estoppel cannot be applied where…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parkview Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Rotunno v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Children's Hospital v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Fendelman v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of ScarsdaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rivera v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API