Legal Opinion

(HC) Keo v. Field Office Director

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 12, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00945Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SOKHEAN KEO, Case No. 24-cv-04280 NC (PR) 12 Petitioner, ORDER OF TRANSFER 13 v. 14 CURRENT OR ACTING FIELD 15 OFFICE DIRECTOR, et al., 16 Respondents. 17 18 Petitioner, a non-citizen detainee currently confined at the Mesa Verde Detention 19 Center in Bakersfield, California, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 20 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his prolonged detention without a hearing as unconstitutional. 21 Dkt. No. 1 at 2. Petitioner names several Respondents, including the “Current or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ricardo Lopez-Marroquin v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API