Legal Opinion
Lutynski v. B.B. & J. Trucking, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 31, 1994No. 14822PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
The sole question in this appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Appellate Court is whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the trial court was required by General Statutes § 52-192a,1 to award prejudgment interest to the plaintiff after he had obtained a jury verdict in an amount *527in excess of his previously filed offer of judgment. We granted certification to consider the issue;2 Lutynski v. B.B. & J. Trucking, Inc., 227 Conn. 914, 632 A.2d 697 (1993); and affirm the judgment of the Appellate Court.
The facts giving rise to the defendant’s appeal are set forth in detail in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stankiewicz v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Lutynski v. B. B. & J. Trucking, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. LeonardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Board of Education v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Lutynski v. B. B. & J. Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
3Cited by14 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, Inc. v. EI Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Suarez-Negrete v. TrottaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Loomis Institute v. Town of WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Ceci Bros. v. Five Twenty-One Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.