Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 25, 2018No. A163691Published

1Per curiam

*105Defendant appeals a judgment convicting him on two counts of felon in possession of a firearm. ORS 166.270(1). On appeal, defendant asserts that the trial court erred by entering separate convictions on the counts of felon in possession of a firearm because those counts were based on his simultaneous possession of two firearms and that conduct violated a single statute, involved only one victim (the public), and was not separated by any pause.1 The state concedes *429that the trial court erred in failing to merge the guilty verdicts on those counts, and we agree and accept the state's concession.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. GlazierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API