Legal Opinion

Thrasher v. Cox Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 29, 1993No. A93A0782PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Corlis Thrasher (plaintiff) filed a defamation action against Cox Enterprises, Inc., Hyde Post and Rebecca Perl (defendants), alleging defendants published a newspaper article entitled, “ ‘A Close Look at a Hidden Danger . . . Often Symptom-Less Chlamydia Threatens the Sexually Active,” which falsely implies that plaintiff is scourged with the infectious disease chlamydia as a result of promiscuous conduct. Defendants admitted publication of the above article, but denied liability and moved for summary judgment.

The trial court correctly found that the article implies…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barber v. PerdueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Hub Motor Co. v. ZurawskiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Lester v. Trust Co. of Ga.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Stalvey v. Atlanta Business Chronicle, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cox Enterprises, Inc. v. ThrasherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Kersey v. United States Shoe Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Thrasher v. Cox Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API