Legal Opinion

Lucianelli v. City of Newton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 8, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages sustained by the plaintiff’s intestate by reason of a defective and dangerous condition in an alleged highway, called Manet Road, in the defendant city. The sole question raised by these exceptions is whether the place where the plaintiff’s intestate fell was within a public way.

The printed record is not clear as to the precise place where the injuries were received, except that it was not within the wrought part of Manet Road. There was no evidence to show that Manet Road was ever laid out as a public way and accepted as such. There was evidence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weare v. Inhabitants of FitchburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Harvey v. Inhabitants of SandwichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Stone v. Inhabitants of AttleboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Abihider v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Sullivan v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Longley v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. People v. DexterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Spalke v. Board of Appeals of PlymouthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. People v. DexterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API