J.M. Hollister, LLC v. Architectural Access Board
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.
This case turns on the interpretation and application of a Massachusetts regulation requiring that each “entrance” to a public building or facility be accessible to persons with disabiliti es. See G. L. c. 22, § 13A; 521 Code Mass. Regs. §§ 5.1, 25.1 (2006). The Architectural Access Board (board) issued a final decision concluding that each of the three doorways of a retail store in Kingston, operated by J.M. Hollister, LLC (Hollister), was a separate entrance, and therefore that each doorway was required to be accessible to persons with disabilities. The board also denied Hollister’s request…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- New Boston Garden Corp. v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Seagram Distillers Co. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Southern Worcester County Regional Vocational School District v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Labor Relations Commission v. University Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Warcewicz v. Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Magazu v. Department of Children and FamiliesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Magazu v. Department of Children and FamiliesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016