Legal Opinion
Goodman v. DeAzoulay
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 25, 1981No. Civ. A. 81-2250PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHAPIRO, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an action brought by Faye Goodman (“Goodman”) and Thelma Makavitt (“Makavitt”) against Daniel DeAzoulay (“DeAzoulay”) and Michael Levin (“Levin”) that arises out of proposed development of residential real estate. It is alleged that defendants conspired to defraud Goodman and Makavitt of invested funds by misrepresenting their professional experience, past projects and future prospects, and the return plaintiffs would realize on real estate investments in Margate, New Jersey and Florida (First Amended Complaint ¶ 10, ¶ 20).
Plai…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Constructors Association Of Western Pennsylvania v. KrepsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- A.L.K. Corporation v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Graystone Nash, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Simms v. Exeter Architectural Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Goodman v. DeAzoulayDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983