Legal Opinion

Silva v. Holland

California Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1888No. 12150PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

This is an action to recover the value of work and labor alleged to have been performed by plaintiff for defendants, who are husband and wife.

The answer denied all the allegations of the complaint, and alleged that there was a misjoinder of parties defendant.

Findings were waived by both parties, and judgment was given in favor of plaintiff for $374, and costs.

The defendants moved for a new trial, and have appealed from the judgment and order denying their motion.

The only point made for appellants relates to the alleged misjoinder of defendants. It is contended that it appeared…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coffey v. GreenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. 366-388 Geary Street, L.P. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Ferguson v. IngleOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Luri v. GreenwaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Gonzales v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API