Legal Opinion

Woodard v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 7, 1999PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated March 29, 1998, which granted the separate motions of the defendant New York City Transit Authority and the defendant City of New York for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the New York City Transit Authority (hereinafter the NYCTA) for summary judgment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Monteleone v. Incorporated Village of Floral ParkNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Thomas v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Gomes v. Courtesy Bus Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Gill v. O.N.S. TruckingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ritts v. TeslenkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Mazzola v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Betzold v. Town of BabylonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Bright v. McGowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Madtes v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API