Legal Opinion

Estate of Proctor D. Rensenhouse, Deceased, the Michigan Trust Company, on Review v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, on Review

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 3, 1958No. 13234_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel in open court, and it appearing that petitioning executor claimed a marital deduction for a widow’s allowance under Section 812(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 812(e), and that the Tax Court denied such claim on the ground that the widow’s allowance did not constitute property passing from the decedent, as defined in Section 812(e)(3); and it further appearing that the grounds upon which the Tax Court decided the case have been abandoned by the Treasury…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. King v. WisemanDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1956

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dorothy Jane Dougherty and Louis F. Baldwin, Executors of the Estate of Allen P. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  2. Gale v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
  3. United States v. First National Bank and Trust Company of Augusta, as Under Will of J. Adolphus SetzeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
  4. Molner v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
  5. Estate of Rudnick v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API