Legal Opinion
Pierce County Auto Co. v. Menard
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 11, 1916No. 12983Published
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered February 11, 1915, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action of replevin, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
This is an action in replevin, brought by the Pierce County Auto Company against J. A. Menard to recover certain machinery and tools claimed to have been sold Menard by the company’s secretary without authority from the company. The cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury, and resulted in a judgment in favor of Menard. The company appeals.
The court made the following findings of fact:
“(2) That at some time prior to the commencement of this action, one F. M. Russell, the then secretary of the plaintiff company, executed and delivered a bill of sale in the name of the plaintiff of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kley v. . HealyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Schofield v. ShifferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Sloane v. ShifferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Sisson, Potter & Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1891
- Friend Bros. Clothing Co. v. HulbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.