Legal Opinion

In re Stillman

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 15, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The claimant, Himrod, bases .a portion of his claim upon certain promissory notes of decedent payable to him. The claimant’s checks to the order of decedent for amounts corresponding to the notes indorsed by the decedent and paid by the claimant’s bank accompany the notes. The attorney for the claimant produced the notes in court and offered them in evidence, having first proved by competent testimony the signatures of the decedent thereto. Objection was made by the executors to their admission, upon the ground that unless delivery of the notes is shown by testimony other than his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cowee v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Newcombe v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Pfister v. HeinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. Wilber v. GillespieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of RayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API