Legal Opinion

Neese v. Riley

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1890No. 6368PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from Guadalupe. Tried below before Hon. George McCormick.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Judge.

—This suit was instituted by James Riley, the defendant in error, against Isaac Neese, plaintiff in error, upon two promissory notes, and to foreclose vendor’s lien upon 90 or 93 acres of land described in the petition. The petition alleges that Isaac Neese, on the 1st of December, 1885, bought of A. J. Fry a tract of land, and in consideration therefor made, executed, and delivered to Fry two promissory notes, dated December 1, 1885, for §125 each, bearing 10 per cent interest from date, and containing a stipulation that should the notes not be paid at maturity Neese should…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Ellis v. SingletaryTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Robertson v. GuerinTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Wynn v. FlanneganTexas Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Smith v. Mortgage & Debenture Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900
  2. Walters v. Texas Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  3. Garrett v. Interstate BankTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Fennimore v. InghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Finley v. WakefieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API