Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Globe Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Bell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 1, 1935No. 33150PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Justice.

Under the terms of a written contract, which was recorded in the parish records, the Globe Automatic Sprinkler Company installed an automatic sprinkler system in the sash and door factory operated by C. C. Bell in the city of West Monroe. Subsequently, Bell made a dation en paiement lo the Monroe Building & Loan Association of 33 parcels of real estate, including the factory containing the sprinkler system, in consideration of the cancellation by the building and loan association of the mortgage notes bearing upon the property conveyed.

This suit was instituted by the Globe…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re Receivership of Augusta Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. Carlin v. GordySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
  3. Baldwin v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  4. Richardson v. Item Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  5. Walburn-Swenson Co. v. DarrellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re TrahanDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1968
  2. Cristina Inv. Corporation v. Gulf Ice Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. McNamara v. Oilfield Const. Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Cottonport Bank v. DunnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HahnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API