Speight v. Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Co.
Utah Supreme Court
!Aj?peal from District Court, Third District; Hon. T. D. 'Lewis Judge. Action by George Harold Speight against the Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Company, and another. Judgment for plaintiff. The Telephone company appealed. APPELLANT'S POINTS.
Read the full summary
!Aj?peal from District Court, Third District; Hon. T. D. 'Lewis Judge. Action by George Harold Speight against the Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Company, and another. Judgment for plaintiff. The Telephone company appealed. APPELLANT'S POINTS. The rule of law as to the assumption of risks by servants who are minors is stated in the following cases, where minors suffered injuries in the course of their employment: (Hickly v. Taafe, 105 . T. 26; Grown v. Orr [N. Y.], 35 N. E. 648; Brobet v. Phipps [Mass.], 21 N. E. 370; Pratt v. Prouty [Mass.], 26 N. E. 1002; Downey v. Sawyer [Mass.], 32 N. E.…
1Opinion
ON PETITION POR REHEARING.
McCARTY, J.
'Counsel for appellant have filed a petition for a rehearing. The ground upon which they ask for a reargument is that certain questions raised and presented by their assignment of errors are not discussed in the opinion filed in the case. In connection with the questions discussed' in the opinion the matters now referred to by counsel were by us given due attention, and, as stated in the opinion, we did not regard them as being of “sufficient merit to entitle them to consideration.” To state our position more clearly, we did not deem them of sufficient…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Spiking v. Consolidated Ry. & Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1908
- Hickey v. Rio Grande Western Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1905