State v. Ito
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was convicted in the municipal court of Minneapolis of the offense of selling intoxicating liquor without a license. From the judgment of conviction, Waite, J., defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The defendant was convicted in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis of a violation of a city ordinance which provided that: “No person shall sell, vend, deal in, or dispose of any spirituous, vinous, fermented, or malt liquors, in or at any building or other place within the limits of the city of Minneapolis, without first having obtained a license therefor.” He appealed from the judgment, and here urges that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the finding .by the trial judge that he was guilty. The record, so far as here material, is this:
“William F. Mealey and Grant Baker,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- State v. MortonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- Penner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Anderson v. FantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- State v. ProvencherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- State v. ProvencherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916