Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schwartz v. Heffernan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 25, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1DissentCohn, J.

The damages which plaintiff is claiming are those occasioned not by any action of the board of elections, but by plaintiff’s own failure to exercise the summary remedy provided in section 330 of the Election Law. His omission to proceed under that statute, which vests in the Supreme Court summary power to determine any questions of law or fact arising with respect to the designating of any candidate bars plaintiff from recovery here.

Statutory remedies to correct the actions of administrative agencies, such as the remedy provided in section 330 of the Election Law should, when available, be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooper v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Jenkins v. WaldronNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  3. Frank v. EatonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  4. Block v. SassamanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1939
  5. Schwartz v. HeffernanNew York Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. HeffernanNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Signature Health Center, LLC v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2010
  3. Gage v. MonescalchiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API