Legal Opinion

McClintock v. State Bank of Table Rock

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1897No. 7353PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from tbe district court of Pawnee county. Tried below before Babcock, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

Suit by an indorsee of a promissory note against tbe makers. Defense that tbe note, after execution and delivery, without tbe knowledge and consent of tbe makers, was materially altered by inserting in blanks therein tbe *131figures “10” and the word “date,” making the note, which drew no interest when executed, draw interést at the rate of ten per cent per annum from date. Yerdict and judgment for the indorsee, and the makers prosecute error.

1. The first assignment is that the court erred in not suppressing certain depositions taken and read on the trial in behalf of the plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dorsey v. ConradNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Colby v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  2. First Nat. Bank v. LiewerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  3. Ohio National Bank v. Gill Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Teske v. BaumgartNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Anderson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API