Legal Opinion

Stout v. Hicks

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1838PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ERROR to the Fountain Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This was an action of debt. The declaration states that Hicks made his promissory note to certain persons using the name, style, and firm of Stout, Ingoldsby, Co., whereby he promised to pay them, &c., and that afterwards Stout, Ingoldsby, Co. by indorsement on said note under their hands, assigned the same to the plaintiffs.

The defendant demurred to the declaration, and the Court sustained the demurrer.

In support of the judgment of the Circuit Court, it is contended that the note set forth in the declaration, was not *50assigned as is required by the act of assembly, which provides that notes…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Childress v. EmorySupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Cochran v. ScottNew York Supreme Court · 1829

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. BlatchfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Hauser v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Phipps v. AddisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1845

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API