Legal Opinion

Pavia v. 810 Broadway Associates

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Martin B. Stecher, J.

Defendant moves for an order punishing Jill Burkee and German Pucci for contempt of court because of their failure, as nonparty witnesses, to comply with a subpoena duces tecum to appear at a pretrial deposition.

The 1984 amendment to CPLR 3101 (a) (4) permits one to obtain disclosure by nonparties “upon notice stating the circumstances or reasons such disclosure is sought or required.” The intent of the amendment is to liberalize a party’s right to obtain a nonparty’s disclosure, shifting to the latter, or an adversary of the one seeking disclosure,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doe v. RoeNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In re Deloitte, Haskins & SellsNew York Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Yost v. DourisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API