Parker v. Follensbee
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago. This was an action of debt on a bail bond, brought by Milton Parker against Samuel M. Standish, principal, and Charles Follensbee, security. Service of process was had on the security only. The declaration was in the usual form on a bail bond, and was admitted by the parties to be sufficient.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago. This was an action of debt on a bail bond, brought by Milton Parker against Samuel M. Standish, principal, and Charles Follensbee, security. Service of process was had on the security only. The declaration was in the usual form on a bail bond, and was admitted by the parties to be sufficient. The only question raised in the record was the third special plea of the defendant, Ftillensbee, as follows: “ And for a further plea in this behalf, the said defendant says, actio non, because he says that the affidavit upon which the wit of capias ad…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker
This was an action on a bail bond, brought by Milton Parker, in the Superior Court of Chicago, against Samuel M. Standish and Charles Follensbee. The declaration is in the usual form and no question is raised as to its sufficiency. The only objection taken to any portion of the proceedings arises on the third special plea of Follensbee. It avers that the affidavit upon which the writ of capias ad respondendum was issued against Standish, and upon which he was held to bail, as alleged in the declaration, does not comply with the Constitution of the State-of Illinois, and with our statute, in…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Kerwin v. BalhatchettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909