Doe v. Eppel

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying that part of plaintiffs motion seeking leave to amend the complaint to add the proposed first and fourth causes of action. Those proposed causes of action allege medical malpractice based upon defendant’s involvement in a sexual relationship with plaintiff when she was defendant’s patient. The fact that plaintiff filed a complaint of professional misconduct with the Office of Professional Medical Conduct based upon the same conduct does not…