Ham v. State ex rel. Williams
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR. The first-named case was from the Wayne Circuit Court; the second, from the Vanderburgh Circuit Court; and the third, from the Bartholomew Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
— Informations were filed in each of the foregoing cases in the nature of writs of quo warranto, alleging that the defendants unlawfully held and exercised in their respective counties, the office of county treasurer; that the relators were entitled to the office; and praying the judgment of the Court, &c.
The facts stated in each of the records before us are substantially the same, and are as follows, viz.: The defendants were elected treasurers of their respective counties on the first Monday of August, 1841, were duly qualified, and entered upon the duties of their office. On the first…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Spencer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
- Horton v. Mobile School CommissionersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1869
- Gibbons v. BrittenumMississippi Supreme Court · 1878
- Simington v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
- State v. MiskimmonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.