Legal Opinion · Dissent

Collentine v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 17, 1925Published

1Dissent

I must confess that I am not free from doubt in this case. I concurred in the opinion as originally filed, but on rehearing I am very much in doubt as to the correctness of the original opinion. The supplemental opinion does not altogether answer the troubles that confront me.

We are committed in this state to the doctrine of an undisclosed principal. All of the courts of the country and all of the text-writers recognize the doctrine as being an anomaly, and wholly inconsistent with the general principles of the law of contract. It has been engrafted on the law by virtue of necessity, to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Strohmeier v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API