Legal Opinion

Doe v. Roe

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 23, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

Richard Roe, the defendant, appeals from an order of the Superior Court, Hancock County, granting the Bangor Publishing Company’s motions to intervene and vacate an earlier order impounding court records. Finding that intervention was improperly granted, we vacate the order lifting the impoundment and remand to the Superior Court for denial of the motion to intervene.

I

On behalf of John Doe, a minor claiming damages resulting from allegedly negligent medical treatment, 1 his father, acting as guardian and next friend, filed a petition in Superior Court seeking approval of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smuck v. HobsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  2. W. H. Glover Co. v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SimanonokSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  2. State v. MaineHealthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  3. Bangor Publishing Co. v. Town of BucksportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  4. Oak Hill Condominiums v. Diane MarchettiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API