Legal Opinion

Maxfield v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 4, 1998No. 98-37PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANTOON, Judge.

Stephen S. Maxfield appeals an order entered by the Unemployment Appeals Commission (UAC) affirming the decision of the appeals referee that Mr. Maxfield is not entitled to receive unemployment compensation benefits due to employee misconduct. We reverse because the record does not contain substantial competent evidence of misconduct as defined by section 443.036(26)(b), Florida Statutes (1995).

Mr. Maxfield was employed by Swift Transportation as a long distance truck driver. Swift terminated Mr. Maxfield’s employment based on the company’s policy that a driver may be discharged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trinh Trung Do v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Williams v. Unemployment Appeals Com'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Poole v. JB Hunt Transport, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lyster v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOY. APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Girgis v. State, Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Girgis v. State, Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API