Legal Opinion
Hodgman v. Citizens Public Utilities, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 31, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHustman, J.
The crucial question is whether, as the trial court found and held, the terms of the contract between the parties, relating to the acquisition of stock of the Derby Gas & Electric Company, were such as to render request by the defendant for the performance of services by the plaintiff in aid of such acquisition and the rendering of such requested services by the plaintiff, a prerequisite to recovery of compensation at the specified rate, or, as the plaintiff contends, the rendition of such services pertaining to acquisition of the stock of any one or more of the several companies mentioned is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Dolan v. DolanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- North Providence v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Hostettler v. MushrushAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lesser v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Wall v. WasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Doe v. Yale University, No. Cv 90 0305365 S (Dec. 1, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997