Legal Opinion

Claim of Mang v. Actus Automobile Distributors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 20, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed October 7, 1976. The board found: "based on the credible evidence, claimant was required to use his own automobile in order to perform his job; therefore his trip to work became part of his employment. It is, therefore, found that accident arising out of and in the course of employment is established.” Issues of fact are for the board and its decision is supported by substantial evidence and it is not erroneous as a matter of law (see Matter of Lutgen v Conte Elec., 50 AD2d 624; Matter of Shafran v Board of Educ., 25 AD2d 336,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Lutgen v. A. Conte Electrical, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Claim of Shafran v. Board of Education, Central School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane v. TornilloCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Claim of Deland v. Hutchings Psychiatric CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Freebern v. North Rockland CDAAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane v. TornilloCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API