Powell v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1ConcurrenceJohn A. Fogleman, Justice
I concur in the majority opinion. I believe, however, that appellant’s contentions as to Points 1 and 5 are somewhat broader in scope than would appear from the majority opinion.
In his motion for new trial, appellant asserted that there was error in the denial of his "Demurrer-Exception and Second Motion to Quash Information.” As appears from the excerpt of this pleading quoted in the majority opinion, its substance made it, in the alternative, a motion for a further bill of particulars in respect to the particular deficiencies alleged in the pleading. The only such particular upon which…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Underwood v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Brockelhurst v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Bennett and Holiman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Underdown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.