Legal Opinion

May v. Bank of Hardinsburg & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 22, 1912PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Breckinridge Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson—

Affirming.

The sixteenth clause of the will of Fred Walter is in these words:

“The residue of mv estate I desire my executor to invest in sound securities, the interest on same to be paid to my sister, Elizabeth May, during her life; after her death the said sum to pass to her children, but to be held in trust by my executors for their benefit, and the interest only paid to them until they shall respectively arrive at .the age of twenty-five years, if males; if females, when they respectively marry, at which time the *137whole shall be paid over to them,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. List v. RodneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  2. Flora v. AndersonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1895
  3. Hill v. SpencerIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. Los Angeles Trust & Sav. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Blackhurst v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. Quigley's Trustee v. QuigleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Futrell v. Futrell'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Byers, Exr. v. BeddowSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API