Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Montgomery v. Armstrong

United States Circuit Court

Decided May 10, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the Court

JacKSON, J.,

(orally.') The material facts of this case are the following: On the 16th June, 1887. the Montgomery Oil-Works drew its draft on the American - Cotton-Oil Company of Cincinnati, for the sum of $2,379.56, in favor of the First National Bank of Montgomery, Ala. Tlie payee forwarded the draft to the Fidelity National Bank.for collection, under a special indorsement thereof, as follows: “Pay to Ammi Baldwin, cashier, or order, for collection, for account of the First National Bank of Montgomery, Ala.” The draft so indorsed was received by the Fidelity National Bank, at Cincinnati, on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Cook v. TullisSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Cragie v. . HadleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Van Alen v. . American National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Kip v. Bank of New-YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1813

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Independent District of Pella v. BeardU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1897
  2. Lowell v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
  3. Parker State Bank v. PenninggtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. In re M. E. Dunn & Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1912
  5. American Can Co. v. WilliamsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API