Legal Opinion

Fitzsimmons v. Norgle

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1984No. 59749PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simon

This original proceeding for mandamus instituted by the State’s Attorney of Du Page County calls for the interpretation and application of section 5 — 5—3(c)(2) of the Unified Code of Corrections (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 38, par. 1005—5—3(c)(2)). That statute precludes probation as a sentence where the defendant is guilty of various felonies, including “[a] Class 2 or greater felony if the offender had been convicted of a Class 2 or greater felony within ten years of the date on which he committed the offense for which he is being sentenced.” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 38, par.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People of Illinois v. HaronIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. AlejosIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People Ex Rel. Cason v. RingIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  4. People v. HobbsIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People Ex Rel. Carey v. BentivengaIllinois Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Harris v. Manor Healthcare Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. HillenbrandIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. RissleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API