Legal Opinion

Little River Drainage District v. Lassater

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 11, 1930PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, P. J.

Action to recover fees retained by defendant as Collector of Richland Township, Stoddard County, for collecting taxes due plaintiff, alleged to have been in excess of fees for that service authorized by law. ' The petition was in two counts, covering alleged illegal fees retained by defendant from current taxes collected in the years 1925 and 1926. The trial court found for defendant, and plaintiff was granted an appeal to this court.

The facts are not disputed. Appellant (plaintiff below) is a drainage district, organized under the Circuit Court Drainage District Law. [Art. I, Chap. 28, R. S.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Mound City Land & Stock Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. Merchants Exchange v. KnottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Greene County v. LydySupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. State ex rel. Buchanan County v. ImelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Graves v. PurcellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Mooney v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Thatcher v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  4. Hawkins v. City of FayetteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. Central Surety Insurance v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API