Legal Opinion

State v. Fischer

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 3, 1999No. 96-787PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendant, David Fischer, was convicted of attempted first degree assault, see RSA 629:1 (1996); RSA 631:1 (1996), and witness tampering, see RSA 641:5 (1996). On appeal, he argues that the Superior Court (Mohl, J.) erred in: (1) admitting a prior consistent statement of the victim to bolster the victim’s credibility; (2) issuing a “false exculpatory evidence” instruction to the jury; and (3) refusing to strike an allegedly improper statement made by the State during its closing argument and failing to issue a curative instruction. We affirm.

The following facts were adduced at trial. The…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brogan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. United States v. Mohammad Dawood NusratyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Ernest James PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Wallace David EleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. State v. BujnowskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. EvansSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. State v. GlodgettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  3. State v. YoungSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  4. State v. FischerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  5. State v. McLeodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API