Legal Opinion

Bell v. Apache Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 4, 1989No. 89-219PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The question in this case is whether a tenant is the agent of the owner of real property for the purpose of receiving notice that a materialman’s lien will be asserted. The trial court held in this case that notice was properly given by the lien claimant to the tenant as agent of the owner. We reverse and remand.

The facts are undisputed. The appellants are owners of Little Rock city lots and a building which was leased to J. M. Mulligan’s Grille in 1987. The lease was executed on behalf of Mulligan’s by Michael Chandlar, its president. The lease provided that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ashdown Hardware Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  2. Whitcomb v. GansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Ellis v. Fayetteville Lumber & Cement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  4. Hirsch v. FarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Shannon Supply Co. v. AveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Books-A-Million, Inc. v. Arkansas Painting & Specialties Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Ron Johnson D/B/A Ron Johnson & Sons, Inc. v. Kris L. Spangler; Tina Marie Spangler; And McGowan Built Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API