Legal Opinion

Murphy v. May

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 19, 1942No. 3 Div. 352PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

As we construe it, the bill as amended seeks to disaffirm and have set aside a sale of real estate made under a mortgage given by complainant’s wife, and to reinvest complainant with the equity of redemption, on the grounds that the mortgage foreclosure sale was made before the maturity of the debt secured by it, or that no proper notice of the purported foreclosure sale was given. The bill further seeks to determine the amount due and offers to pay the same, and asks contribution from the respondents as remaindermen, who are the heirs and next of kin of his wife, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McClurkin v. McClurkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. McWilliams v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Puckett v. PuckettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. People's Savings Bank v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Randolph v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Stafford v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Cook v. BentonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. White v. Board of Adjustment of City of BurminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. Singley v. LandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API