Mayo v. Borovsky
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The remedy of specific performance of a contract for the sale of land is not a form of redress to which a suitor is entitled as a positive right ex debito justitiae. The award or denial of such relief rests within the sound discretion of the court.Kelleher v. Bragg, 96 N.J. Eq. 25; 124 Atl. Rep. 530;affirmed, 97 N.J. Eq. 547; 128 Atl. Rep. 921.
This discretionary power is not exercised as a general rule in favor of a suitor unless it is evident that such party has been ready, desirous, prompt and eager to fulfill and perform his or her obligations under the terms of the contract.Meidling v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fiedler, Inc. v. Coast Finance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
- Meidling v. TrefzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
- Kelleher v. BraggSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
- Kelleher v. BraggNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Vacca v. WilkensNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cline v. KurzweilNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- Hollister v. FiedlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Beck v. Edwards Lewis, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- H.B. VS. P.S. (FM-02-2624-11, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019