Legal Opinion

Hutcherson v. Pilgrim Health & Life Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 1, 1955No. 17009PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. Woodrow Lewis, Acting Associate Justice.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff-respondent for damages for the alleged fraudulent cancellation by the defendant-appellant of an insurance contract issued by it to the respondent. Upon the trial of the case a verdict was rendered for the respondent for $52.00 actual damages and $950.00 punitive damages. Timely motions were made by the appellant during the trial for a nonsuit and directed verdict; and, after the verdict, for judgment non obstante veredicto and, in the alternative, for a new trial. The exceptions on appeal to this Court, as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pack v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. West v. Service Life & Health Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  3. Riley v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  4. Simmons v. Service Life & Health Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  5. Barnes v. Industrial Life & Health InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goo v. Continental Casualty CompanyHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Brown v. United InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. Kinard v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  4. Nabours v. Longview Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Nabours v. Longview Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API