Legal Opinion

United States v. Murphy

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 15, 2009No. 07-4607PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge REIDINGER wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Senior Judge HAMILTON joined.

OPINION

REIDINGER, District Judge:

Damian Antonio Murphy appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and hydromor-phone, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(C) (2000 & Supp.2008), and for possession of counterfeit currency, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 472 (Supp.2008). On appeal, Murphy contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence of a cell phone, $14,790 in U.S. currency, and counterfeit…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Illinois v. LafayetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State of Texas v. Granville, AnthonyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  2. United States v. WurieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. HargroveCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Flores-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API