Legal Opinion

Mastrobuono v. Providence Redevelopment Agency

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 10, 2004No. 2003-156-AppealPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

OPINION

The defendant, the Providence Redevelopment Agency of the City of Providence (the city), appeals from a Superior Court judgment awarding the plaintiffs, John and Carol Mastrobuono (collectively referred to as plaintiffs), $245,750 for the condemnation of their property. The city contends that the trial justice erred in accepting the plaintiffs’ expert’s valuation of the plaintiffs’ property because the expert’s opinion was speculative, was unsupported by adequate foundational facts and failed to account for developmental costs in transforming the property into what the plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nasco, Inc. v. Director of Public WorksSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  2. Gorham v. PUBLIC BLDG. AUTH. OF CITY OF PROVIDENCESupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  3. Serzen v. Director of the Department of Environmental ManagementSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  4. Sun-Lite Partnership v. Town of West WarwickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  5. Sweet v. Town of West WarwickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conti v. Rhode Island Economic Development Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API