Legal Opinion

Radford v. Lovett

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 20, 1974PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff appeals from a final decree on a bill for declaratory relief (G. L. c. 231A) brought to establish his right in stock of Atlantic Stores, Inc. (Atlantic). The decree was based on a stipulation “as to facts, limited to the question of whether the statute of limitations, as set forth in Chapter 260, Section 2, of the General Laws, should apply.” The decree dismissing the bill (erroneous, in any event; Vasilakis v. Haverhill, 339 Mass. 97, 101 [1959]) must be reversed because the basis of the dismissal, that the plaintiffs claim is barred by The statute of limitations, finds no…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dodge v. Anna Jaques HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Hanrihan v. HanrihanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  3. Vasilakis v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Norwood Trust Co. v. Twenty-Four Federal Street Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Zytka v. DmochowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sanguinetti v. Nantucket Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  2. Wrightson v. SpauldingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Brodeur v. American Rexoil Heating Fuel Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  4. Young v. ReedMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  5. MacCleave v. MerchantMassachusetts Superior Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API