Legal Opinion

Polania v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 2, 1968No. 67-358PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appellant was found guilty upon seven informations charging breaking and entering. He was sentenced to 30 years imprisonment. The controlling point presented upon this appeal urges that the trial court committed reversible error by admitting into evidence fingerprints which were the fruit of an arrest, which it is claimed was illegal. See Bynum v. United States, 1958, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 368, 262 F.2d 465; but see Bynum v. United States, 1960, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 109, 274 F.2d 767.

The record establishes that the fingerprint evidence was the product of a prior arrest which occurred before…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clayborne Bynum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  2. Clayborne Bynum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  3. Echols v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Urso v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  5. Diaz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Betancourt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API