Legal Opinion

Raikos v. Bloomfield State Bank

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided January 6, 1989No. IP 88-84-CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

McKINNEY, District Judge.

This Right to Financial Privacy Action comes before the Court on the separate motions to dismiss filed by defendant Bloomfield State Bank and defendant Internal Revenue Service. The issues raised have been fully briefed and are ready for resolution. For two alternative and separate reasons, the Court hereby rules in favor of the defendants. First, the action was not timely filed and must be dismissed. Second, assuming arguendo that the action is not time-barred, the defendants are nonetheless entitled to summary judgment as a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. MottazSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Mitchell B. Haisten, Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of Jean E. Haisten v. Grass Valley Medical Reimbursement Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peggy J. Neece Buel H. Neece v. Internal Revenue Service of the United States of America United States of America First National Bank of Turley, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. Walker v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  3. Internal Revenue Service Document Request to Department of Defense, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1999
  4. McCune v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API