Legal Opinion
Waite v. Orgill
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1958PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepston
There is only one determinative question in the case which is here on demurrer.
Mrs. Waite, the plaintiff in error, filed her declaration against the defendants on November 16, 1956, alleging that she suffered certain injuries on the 15th day of May, 1956, and that notice to the Mayor of Memphis had been *148given on Jnne 25, 1956. On December 17, 1956, defendants filed pleas of not guilty, contributory negligence and insufficient notice, and then special pleas as ordered.
On June 21, 1957, plaintiff in error was granted leave to amend her declaration, which she did on July 3, 1957, in which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Knoxville v. FeldingTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- Hughes v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- Gilkey v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- Robinson v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
- Sneed v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jane Doe, a Minor Child, by Next Friend, Leslie G. Fein v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Maier v. City of KetchikanAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
- Orsini v. Larry Moyer Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Hill v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Kelleher v. Ephrata School District No. 165Washington Supreme Court · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.