Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 15, 1995No. 94-2614PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the defendant Ralph Nathaniel Miller from a trial court order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800(a). Based on the state’s confession of error, which we *366accept as well-taken, we reverse the order appealed from based on a holding that where, as here, a sentence is imposed under the sentencing guidelines, the trial court has no authority to retain jurisdiction over the defendant’s sentence. Hansbrough v. State, 509 So.2d 1081,1087 (Fla.1987) (“Because the sentencing guidelines apply to that sentence, however, the trial court should…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hansbrough v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Gainey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Raley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API