Legal Opinion

Shippey v. Hough

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from McLennan. Tried below before Hon. Marshall SuRr ratt.

1Opinion of the Court

KEY, Associate Justice.

The nature and result of this suit is thus stated in appellants’ brief:

“Appellants, Martha M. Shippey, C. W. Shippey, George W. Shippey, and Norman E. Hough, as plaintiffs in the court below, brought suit in trespass to try title and for partition against Nettie Hough, the appellee, claiming an undivided one-half interest in and to a tract of 320 acres of land known as the Peter Bolinger survey, and also for other lands, not necessary to mention here. The respective interests of the appellants were alleged to be as follows: Martha M. Shippey, an undivided one-third…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Houston & Great Northern R. R. v. WinterTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Gilliam v. NullTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Ball, Hutchings & Co. v. LowellTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Hough v. ShippeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crow v. First Nat. Bank of WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Blake v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. Meyers v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Meyers v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. in the Estate of Consuella Perkins Ulbrich, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API