Legal Opinion

Middleton v. Wilson & Lozano

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Mobile City Court. Tried before Hou. O. J. Semmes.

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, C. J.-

Tefft, Weller & Co. were wholesale merchants doing business in New York, and Sweeny was a salesman of theirs, having more than usual powers to negotiate sales, either as to a class of persons, or within a certain locality. The record does not inform us as to the precise nature or extent of his powers. We infer that he was specially authorized to negotiate sales to customers, whose patronage of the' house was procured through his instrumentality, and that Wilson & Lozano, retail merchants of Mobile, Alabama, were óf that class. It is not shown -whether Sweeny was what is known as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitcham v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Harris v. PowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Adams v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  4. Tyree v. Lyon, Murphy & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pollock v. MeyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Scarbrough v. Borders & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  3. Lightman Bros. & Goldstein v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API