Legal Opinion

Pahl v. Pahl

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 2004No. 03-72PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

[T1] Andrea M. Pahl (Mother) appeals the district court's decision to award primary custody of the parties' child to Troy M. Pahl (Father). Mother contends the district court failed to consider that she was the primary caregiver when making its custody determination and thus abused its discretion. Mother further asserts the district court relied exclusively on the fact that she planned to take the child to Germany when it decided to award primary custody to Father. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm.

ISSUE

[12] Mother presents the following issue on appeal:

Did the trial…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Vanasse v. RamsayWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Reavis v. ReavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Pace v. PaceWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Cranston v. CranstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Tyler R. Kimzey v. Shelby K. KimzeyWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Tamra Acorn, Rebecca Shwen, and Federer Holding Company, LLC, a Wyoming close limited liability company v. Lori Moncecchi and Dino MoncecchiWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Hayzlett v. HayzlettWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Witowski v. RooseveltWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Bruegman v. BruegmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2018

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API